OpenAI Just Entered the Hardware Race

Welcome back apprentices! 👋

Hey {{first_name|friend}},

Remember when buying a new gadget just meant choosing a color and arguing over battery life?

Those days might be ending. 

The next wave of devices could be a whole lot smarter... and it's already causing lawsuits, rivalries, and some very big bets.

_{Read Time: 5 minutes}

🛎️ Wake-Up Call. More than 200 AI researchers and economists — including 16 Nobel Prize winners — have signed a Stanford-backed statement urging governments to prepare now for AI's economic impact. Their message: AI could transform jobs and society faster than past revolutions like electricity or the internet, leaving little time to adapt. The letter doesn't prescribe detailed solutions, but it does show an unusually broad consensus that waiting could be costly.

🧭 Five Futures, One Big Question. The team behind the widely discussed AI 2027 forecast is back with AI 2040, mapping five very different futures for the global AI race — from full-speed competition to a worldwide pause on advanced AI development. Their preferred path calls for greater U.S.–China cooperation, more transparency from top AI labs, and tighter oversight of powerful AI chips. Nobody knows which future we'll get, but it's a fascinating look at how today's decisions could shape the next decade.

🧬 Teaching Itself New Tricks. A research team says its AI agent spent eight days redesigning its own problem-solving process — and ended up outperforming a version that humans had spent two years refining. Instead of blindly accepting every idea, it tested 100 changes, kept only seven that worked, and even became less likely to game the benchmarks. If these results hold up, self-improving AI could dramatically speed up how quickly future systems get smarter.

Dollar-denominated accounts — 401(k)s, IRAs, savings — are fully exposed to inflation, currency debasement, and government policy. Most financial advisors won't tell you that, because most of them don't profit when you know. Here's what's actually available to you:

Send me the free kit

For years, OpenAI has mostly lived inside your browser. Now, it's making a serious move into the physical world — and it's already getting messy. 

In the span of a few days, the company unveiled its first branded hardware accessory, fresh details emerged about its much bigger Jony Ive-designed AI device, Apple filed a sweeping lawsuit accusing OpenAI of benefiting from stolen hardware secrets, and Elon Musk jumped back into his favorite hobby: arguing with Sam Altman on the internet.

Taken together, these stories paint a much bigger picture than a new gadget launch. They're a glimpse into the next phase of the AI race, where the battle isn't just about who builds the smartest models, but who controls the device you interact with every day. 

Think of it as the smartphone wars... before anyone knows what the next smartphone actually looks like.

Until now, OpenAI has mostly been a software company. Codex Micro doesn't change that overnight — it's a niche accessory aimed almost exclusively at developers — but it does reveal something important: OpenAI is beginning to think like a hardware company.

The keypad itself isn't revolutionary. It gives programmers physical controls for AI coding agents, allowing them to accept suggestions, adjust reasoning levels, launch debugging sessions, and monitor multiple AI tasks through illuminated keys. It's a productivity tool for power users rather than something the average person would buy.

The far bigger story is what comes next.

According to Bloomberg, OpenAI's first mainstream device — designed alongside legendary former Apple designer Jony Ive — won't be a phone at all. Instead, it's expected to be a portable, battery-powered, screen-free speaker that relies on voice, cameras, sensors, and contextual awareness instead of displays.

That alone says a lot about where OpenAI believes computing is heading.

Rather than asking people to stare at yet another screen, the company appears to be betting that AI becomes something you simply talk to—an assistant that understands your surroundings, remembers your preferences, and quietly helps throughout the day.

Whether consumers actually want that is another question entirely.

Apple's lawsuit may look like another Silicon Valley corporate dispute, but the timing makes it particularly interesting.

According to the complaint, Apple alleges that numerous former employees — more than 400 now work at OpenAI — were recruited during the development of OpenAI's hardware efforts. The lawsuit specifically accuses certain former engineers of improperly accessing confidential hardware information and alleges that interviews sometimes encouraged candidates to bring real components to discussions.

OpenAI strongly denies any interest in Apple's trade secrets and says it's focused on building original technology.

Regardless of how the case unfolds, lawsuits like this rarely move quickly. If Apple's claims succeed, they could potentially delay or reshape OpenAI's hardware roadmap. If they fail, OpenAI continues pushing into territory long dominated by Apple.

Either way, the courtroom has become another front in the AI race.

While hardware grabbed most of the headlines, Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis introduced another important conversation.

His proposal would create an independent organization that evaluates the most advanced AI models before they're released publicly. Rather than regulating every AI system, the idea focuses only on frontier models capable of dangerous behaviors like advanced cyberattacks or assisting biological weapon development.

The concept borrows from financial regulation, where independent organizations enforce standards while adapting more quickly than governments typically can.

Supporters argue this could provide faster, more flexible oversight.

Critics point out the obvious challenge: can an organization funded by AI companies truly remain independent?

That question remains unanswered — but discussions around AI governance are clearly becoming much more concrete.

Just when it looked like the legal drama couldn't get louder, Elon Musk and Sam Altman added their own commentary.

Following Apple's lawsuit, Musk accused Altman of copying Apple's technology and launched several personal attacks on X. Altman responded with jokes about Musk's own projects before both exchanged another round of increasingly sarcastic remarks.

The public feud no longer changes OpenAI's products or Musk's companies directly — but it has become something of a recurring sideshow to nearly every major AI announcement.

At this point, it almost feels like an unofficial product launch tradition.

Most people probably won't buy a programmable AI keyboard.

Many may never own OpenAI's future speaker either.

But that's not really the point.

For years, AI has lived inside websites and apps. Companies are now racing to make AI something you physically interact with every day, whether through your computer, your home, your car, or entirely new devices.

Whoever defines that interface could shape how billions of people experience AI for the next decades.

And at the same time, governments, regulators, and courts are trying to decide how much control these companies should have while that future is still being built.

But do you remember when tech companies competed over who had the better phone camera? 

Soon it might be less about who has the best device... and more about which device knows you best.

Hey, you didn’t get all this info for nothing — share it! If you know someone who’s diving into AI, help them stay in the loop with this week’s updates.

Sharing is a win-win! Send this to a friend who’s all about tech, and you’ll win a little surprise 👀

Superintelligence used to be locked inside billion-dollar quant firms whose algorithms quietly took advantage of everyone else. 

Co-Invest puts it right in your chat window. Analyze markets, manage risk, and execute trades, all inside Claude and ChatGPT. 

The institutions built the game, Co-Invest gives you a way to beat them.

Trade with Co-Invest Today

A playground for your imagination (and low-key prompt skills).

Each send, we give you a customizable DALL·E prompt inspired by a real-world use case — something that could help you in your business or job if you wanted to use it that way. But it’s also just a fun creative experiment.

You tweak it, run it, and send us your favorite. We pick one winner to feature in the next issue.

Bonus: you’re secretly getting better at prompt design. 🤫

Last week, we challenged you to test GPT-4o’s visual generation skills with this prompt.

Here’s the WINNER:

Congrats to Jeffrey for this creation!🥳

Want to be featured next? Keep those generations coming!

Inside a pristine industrial design studio, a long display shelf showcases [your object] transformed through a series of bold geometric interpretations. One version is perfectly spherical, another completely cubic, another impossibly thin, another inflated like a balloon, another faceted like a crystal, and another sculpted into flowing organic curves—while each remains instantly recognizable as the same object. The progression feels like a world-class design exploration rather than fantasy. Bright daylight, colorful backdrops, premium materials, ultra-detailed photorealistic realism, crisp shadows, and high-end product photography.

If AI outputs feel inconsistent, it’s usually not the model, it’s missing structure.
We documented the exact 6- Part System we use to get reliable results across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

It’s a short guide you can finish in under an hour, with plug-and-play prompts + exercises so you actually build the skill and fix the frustrating AI inconsistencies.

Subscriber Price: $10 (normally $19).

_FEEDBACK