AI’s Biggest Battle Isn’t Intelligence Anymore

Welcome back apprentices! 👋

Hey {{first_name|friend}},

AI companies apparently decided benchmarks weren’t dramatic enough. 

Now we’ve got cheaper models, courtroom fights, leadership shakeups and billionaires accidentally turning software partnerships into geopolitical events.

 If it felt complicated before, somebody just added a few extra lanes.

_{Read Time: 4 minutes}

🪥 AI Comes for Your Teeth. Dyson’s new CameraJet combines an electric toothbrush, AI-powered camera, and water jet to spot gaps between your teeth and clean them as you brush. The system analyzes 28 images per second, tracks brushing coverage in the MyDyson app, and was trained on 470,000 dental images — because apparently even brushing your teeth needs machine learning now. At $499, the bigger story is whether Dyson can turn another boring household essential into a premium tech category.

❤️ AI Spots Hidden Heart Disease. Imperial College London researchers built an AI that can scan a routine ECG in under two seconds and flag heart failure or valve disease that doctors may not catch from the test alone. Trained on 10.6 million ECGs, it detected heart failure in 81% of cases and valve disease in 90%, with hospital trials now underway. If it holds up, the NHS could eventually use it on every ECG — turning a test hospitals already run into a much stronger early-warning system.

🤖 Claude Learns to Run Machines. Anthropic’s new Model Hardware Standard lets AI agents learn how to operate lab and factory equipment — from microscopes to robotic arms — without weeks of custom programming. In one test, Claude figured out how to align a laser through trial and error, then turned what it learned into an automated routine. If the standard catches on, connecting AI to physical machines could become almost as easy as connecting it to software.

AI made PMs faster. Multiplayer mode is still broken.

A PM can summarize research, draft a PRD, and mock up a prototype before lunch. The hard part starts when the team has to decide what actually gets built.

Jira Product Discovery gives product teams one place to capture insights, prioritize ideas with consistent frameworks, and build living roadmaps stakeholders can rally around.

And because it’s connected to Jira, the context behind every decision stays with the work—so developers and their agents know not just what to build, but why.

AI helps PMs move faster. Jira Product Discovery helps the whole team build with confidence.

Get Started for Free.

The AI industry is entering a more complicated phase, where being the smartest model is only part of the battle. 

Meta and Google are competing to deliver stronger performance at lower cost, Apple is reshaping its leadership while accusing OpenAI of using confidential hardware designs, Anthropic is challenging government control over how its systems can be deployed, and OpenAI is cutting ties with Cursor after its acquisition by a company linked to Elon Musk. 

Together, these developments point to a broader shift: the future of AI will be shaped not just by model quality, but also by economics, hardware, distribution, legal power and control.

The benchmark race has acquired a second scoreboard: cost.

Meta’s Muse Spark 1.3 Max scores 62 on Artificial Analysis’ Intelligence Index, while Google’s Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 59. But Gemini costs about $0.58 per task, produces more than 300 tokens per second and is designed for efficient, high-volume use. Meta is also improving Spark’s efficiency on long tasks.

Once several models are good enough, businesses stop asking only, “Which one is smartest?” They ask, “Which one delivers most of the capability for the lowest bill?”

The AI industry is learning that being excellent is nice; filling the seats profitably is nicer.

John Ternus is taking over Apple as AI and hardware increasingly merge. Tim Cook’s transition was planned, while Phil Schiller’s retreat from day-to-day App Store duties adds to a broader generational shift.

That makes Apple’s legal dispute with OpenAI especially significant. Apple claims former engineer Chang Liu used a confidential power-converter design at OpenAI and says forensic evidence raises concerns about destroyed data. OpenAI disputes the broader allegations and says Apple is trying to slow a potential hardware rival.

The court still has to decide who is right. But the fight shows that Silicon Valley’s AI talent war now includes hardware engineers, chip specialists and product designers, not just software researchers.

Anthropic’s Pentagon dispute could affect the entire AI industry.

After Anthropic objected to certain military uses, the Pentagon designated it a supply-chain risk. Judge Rita Lin ruled that the action amounted to unlawful retaliation, violated First Amendment protections and denied the company due process.

The case highlights a growing tension: AI companies sell strategically important technology while trying to restrict how customers use it. Governments may not have unlimited leverage simply by invoking national security, but the dispute continues, with Anthropic still classified as a supply-chain risk.

The larger question is clear: Who writes the actual rules for powerful AI?

After SpaceX acquired Cursor, OpenAI invoked a change-of-control provision and plans to end access on Nov. 12. OpenAI cited previous contract disputes involving Musk-controlled companies.

Cursor will likely survive: it supports multiple models, Anthropic remains involved and OpenAI represents only a small share of its reported usage.

But the episode reveals a broader shift. AI products once acted as neutral supermarkets for models. Now model companies also compete in coding tools, agents, devices and platforms.

Your supplier can be your competitor, and yesterday’s API partner can become tomorrow’s strategic threat. The AI ecosystem may increasingly resemble smartphones or gaming consoles: competing ecosystems, preferred partners and constant battles over who gets access to what.

For most of us, the useful lesson isn't to memorize whether one model scored 59, 61 or 62 on this week’s leaderboard.

It’s that AI is becoming mature enough that raw intelligence is no longer the only thing worth watching.

If you use AI for work, price and efficiency could increasingly matter more than having the absolute smartest model available. If your company depends heavily on one AI provider, the Cursor situation is a reminder that access can change for reasons having nothing to do with model quality. And if you're watching where the industry goes next, Apple's dispute with OpenAI is another clue that AI is steadily escaping the browser and heading toward physical products, chips and devices.

The winners of the next phase may therefore be the companies that combine four things: great models, affordable economics, strong distribution and control over where their technology goes.

So don’t pick AI tools from leaderboards alone. 

Watch what they cost, where they work, who controls them — and whether your favorite model might disappear from your favorite app after two billionaires have an argument.

Hey, you didn’t get all this info for nothing — share it! If you know someone who’s diving into AI, help them stay in the loop with this week’s updates.

Sharing is a win-win! Send this to a friend who’s all about tech, and you’ll win a little surprise 👀

The future of farming uses autonomous robots instead of herbicides. Greenfield Robotics has spent six years developing its technology, with 82 robots deployed across 16 states. 

Reserve now for 10% bonus shares when you invest.

Invest in Greenfield Robotics

^{Greenfield Robotics is Testing The Waters under tier 2 of Regulation A. No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response will not be accepted. No offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the offering statement filed by the company with the SEC has been qualified by the SEC. Any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or commitment of any kind, at any time before notice of acceptance given after the date of qualification. An indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind. “Reserving” shares is simply an indication of interest. There is no binding commitment for investors that reserve shares in this manner to ultimately invest and purchase the shares reserved of the company, or to purchase any shares of the company whatsoever.}

A playground for your imagination (and low-key prompt skills).

Each send, we give you a customizable DALL·E prompt inspired by a real-world use case — something that could help you in your business or job if you wanted to use it that way. But it’s also just a fun creative experiment.

You tweak it, run it, and send us your favorite. We pick one winner to feature in the next issue.

Bonus: you’re secretly getting better at prompt design. 🤫

Last week, we challenged you to test GPT-4o’s visual generation skills with this prompt.

Here’s the WINNER:

Congrats to Jake for this creation!🥳

Want to be featured next? Keep those generations coming!

In the center of a vast public square, [your object] has been transformed into a monumental sculpture several stories tall. People, trees, cars, and surrounding architecture provide scale, while the object itself retains recognizable details despite its enormous size. Its surface combines unexpected materials — polished stone, translucent glass, brushed metal, and vivid colored panels — catching dramatic afternoon sunlight. Ultra-detailed photorealism, cinematic wide-angle photography, crisp textures, vibrant but sophisticated colors, realistic shadows, premium architectural visualization.

If AI outputs feel inconsistent, it’s usually not the model, it’s missing structure.
We documented the exact 6- Part System we use to get reliable results across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

It’s a short guide you can finish in under an hour, with plug-and-play prompts + exercises so you actually build the skill and fix the frustrating AI inconsistencies.

Subscriber Price: $10 (normally $19).

_FEEDBACK